Wednesday, June 5, 2013

High Heals

That's it: I'm going to hire a lawyer!

Actually, we've talked about this several times, the idea of a "pre-nup" kind of thing to bring some degree of legal status to the Trifecta. (Don't worry, we're not about to start lobbying for legalization of polygamy.) What I want is a document to formalize the financial, medical, and legal ties we have (or want to have). Clearly the biggest beneficiary of this would be Chloe, who currently has NO legal status -- if you've been paying attention, you know that this is a great source of hurt. If anything awful happens (breakup, death, disability, medical catastrophe, job loss), there is a pre-existing setup that protects me and Red. You don't have to do much legwork to get that: get married, and *poof* you're insulated. Chloe, however, could wind up out in the cold under any number of scenarios. Despite having done nothing to deserve it, she is flying without a net, on her own, at risk of devastating loss. Not a beneficiary on anyone's life insurance. No 401K. No guarantee she could find other work if our business goes under. A stateless person in the politics of relationships.

This bothers me terribly.

And not just because Chloe happens to find the fact of marriage more important and appealing than I do (see several previous posts on that topic). But because in very practical terms, she bears all of the risk right now, at the same time that she has the least individual resources of any of us.

When I bring this up Chloe gets uncomfortable. She says she doesn't want to be a burden, doesn't like the idea of elbowing into our financial space. Also it's kind of morbid (someone will die ... maybe someone will break this thing up ...) Such a contract is about as romantic as a two-by-four. But ten days ago Red formally asked Chloe to move in with us, which surprised and delighted both her and me. The melding of resources and space and stuff is in process already. The psychological sense of her "presence" in the house is greater.

That means it's almost time to get this thing on paper.

So I was once again trying to sell the idea to Chloe the other day, as she and I sat at OUR dining room table (tee hee! that's so much fun to say). She objected in the usual way. For whatever reason, this explanation popped into my head for the first time: it's simply an artifact of everyone's history, I said, that you have fewer resources and less safety net than Red and I do. Expecting you to hitch your wagon to ours, but then be the most at risk if bad things happen? That's not fair. How things got this way is nobody's fault. Just like me being three inches shorter than you is not my fault. It's just a fact, neither good nor bad. To level the playing field, however, I can wear high heels. What's wrong with wearing high heels?



That made her smile. It's always been a little weird for Chloe that she is taller than me, and our standing hugs and kisses are therefore asymmetric. If I come home from work in heels and she's already barefoot, we giggle and enjoy the fact that I can be the top hugger, and look her right in the eye.

Love is giggly sometimes, and at other times it's solemn as hell. I want to do both parts right.




6 comments:

  1. Hi again. I think this is a great post. Chloe is a lucky girl to have you looking out for her. Again I am amazed at the lack of jealousy and how the three of you have meshed into one relationship so well. As my husband and I continue to talk about our own openess for this type of relationship and try to "feel" out possible tender spots, I keep hanging up on the loss of our identity as "a couple". Was that ever something you struggled with?

    Again LOVE the blog. Thank you so much for the glimpse into your lives. Best wishes to you all.
    Rhojo

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Rhojo, good question! For me, the loss of "couple" identity was never an issue -- I dunno why, it just never bothered me. However, Chloe has said that if she were the pre-existing wife, it probably *would* bother her. I don't want to speak for Red, but last time I checked he didn't have strong feelings about the matter. :) This is one where it seems important to at least flag your discomfort as a possible problem. You might get surprised at how little you notice it once the time comes. Or if it does end up feeling like a deal-breaker for you, no one can say that came out of the blue.

    Thanks for reading and commenting!
    -Missy

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with rhojo I'm amazed at the lack of jealousy. I would like to know what red does to keep this for hapoaning and how he deals with it if there is a little if one of the girls feels like she is not getting enough attection or affection. Again. Y'all amaze me and I'm glad for all three of you and for y'all sharing the journey. Best of wishes and be damed the doubters

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's no lack of jealousy--there's plenty of it for three. We learn to live with it. We own it.

      As far as attention goes, well, if they're not getting enough from me they can always get it from each other. Sometimes that is their preference. Wait, now I'm not getting enough attention waaaaahhhhh!!!!

      Delete
  4. Hi. Love the blog. Looking forward to future installments. Hope your all well and I hope the move and merging households is going great.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you so much! We are biting our nails over where to put Chloe's (lovely) clothes, but I'm pretty pleased with how things are going. :)

    ReplyDelete

Feel free to comment (please be respectful)!